Comments on: Issues http://delegatedwyer.com District 31 Anne Arundel County Sat, 18 Feb 2012 02:24:20 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: Bill http://delegatedwyer.com/issues/comment-page-1#comment-757 Bill Thu, 27 Jan 2011 19:22:30 +0000 http://delegatedwyer.com/?page_id=228#comment-757 You wrote "Our Founders left England because of the tyranny specifically surrounding the King owning and controlling nearly everything.' That is not an accurate statement. The King was not a dictator. Parliament was more of a problem. You wrote "With today’s technology there is little chance that we are convicting innocent individuals. " I wish that were true, but it is not. First, DNA evidence alone doesn't necessarily tell you who is guilty and could be interpreted in a wrong way. Most cases don't even have DNA evidence anyway. Eye witnesses are sometimes mistaken. I think we would be wiser to error on the side of caution and not have a death penalty. I agree with many of your other statements. You wrote “Our Founders left England because of the tyranny specifically surrounding the King owning and controlling nearly everything.’

That is not an accurate statement. The King was not a dictator. Parliament was more of a problem.

You wrote “With today’s technology there is little chance that we are convicting innocent individuals. ”

I wish that were true, but it is not. First, DNA evidence alone doesn’t necessarily tell you who is guilty and could be interpreted in a wrong way. Most cases don’t even have DNA evidence anyway. Eye witnesses are sometimes mistaken. I think we would be wiser to error on the side of caution and not have a death penalty.

I agree with many of your other statements.

]]> By: General http://delegatedwyer.com/issues/comment-page-1#comment-479 General Mon, 28 Jun 2010 21:42:50 +0000 http://delegatedwyer.com/?page_id=228#comment-479 The Supreme Court successfuly upheld the 2nd admendment. The only thing concerning about this case was that it ended up with a 5-4 majority. The Supreme Court successfuly upheld the 2nd admendment. The only thing concerning about this case was that it ended up with a 5-4 majority.

]]>